5-year outcome after complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of extensive lymph node dissection as performed in complete mesocolic excision are still debated, although recent studies have shown an association with improved long-term outcomes. However, none of these studies had an intention-to-treat design or aimed to show a causal effect; therefore in this study, we aimed to estimate the causal oncological treatment effects of complete mesocolic excision on right-sided colon cancer. METHODS: We did a population-based cohort study involving prospective data collected from four hospitals in Denmark. We compared the oncological outcome data of patients at one centre performing central lymph node dissection and vascular division after almost complete exposure of the proximal part of the superior mesenteric vein (ie, the complete mesocolic excision group) with three other centres performing conventional resections with unstandardised and limited lymph node dissection (ie, non-complete mesocolic excision; control group). We included data for all patients in the Capital Region of Denmark undergoing elective curative-intent right-sided colon resections for stages I-III colon cancer, as categorised by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC; 5th edition), from June 1, 2008, to Dec 31, 2013. Patients were followed-up for 5·2 years after surgery. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of recurrence after 5·2 years of surgery. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and competing risk analyses were used to estimate the possible causal effects of complete mesocolic excision. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03754075. FINDINGS: 1069 patients (813 in the control group and 256 in the complete mesocolic excision group) underwent curative-intent elective surgery for right-sided colon cancer during the study period. None of the patients were lost to follow-up regarding survival or recurrence status, and consequently no patient was censored in the analyses. The 5·2-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 9·7% (95% CI 6·3-13·1) in the complete mesocolic excision group compared with 17·9% (15·3-20·5) in the control group, and the absolute risk reduction of complete mesocolic excision after 5·2 years was 8·2% (95% CI 4·0-12·4; p=0·00015). In the control group, 145 (18%) of 813 patients were diagnosed with a recurrence and 281 (35%) died during follow-up, whereas in the complete mesocolic excision group 25 (10%) of 256 patients were diagnosed with a recurrence and 75 (29%) died during follow-up. INTERPRETATION: This study shows a causal treatment effect of central mesocolic lymph node excision on risk of recurrence after resection for right-sided colon adenocarcinoma. Complete mesocolic excision has the potential to reduce the risk of recurrence and improve long-term outcome after resection for all UICC stages I-III of right-sided colon adenocarcinomas. FUNDING: The Tvergaard Fund, Helen Rude Fund, Krista and Viggo Petersen Fund, Olga Bryde Nielsen Fund, and Else and Mogens Wedell-Wedellsborg Fund.

Long-term Functional Outcome After Right-Sided Complete Mesocolic Excision Compared With Conventional Colon Cancer Surgery: A Population-Based Questionnaire Study.

BACKGROUND: Complete mesocolic excision improves the long-term outcome of colon cancer but might carry a risk of bowel dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether right-sided complete mesocolic excision is associated with an increased risk of long-term bowel dysfunction and reduced quality of life compared with conventional colon cancer resections. DESIGN: Data were extracted from a population-based study comparing complete mesocolic excision and conventional colon cancer resections and from a national questionnaire survey regarding functional outcome. SETTINGS: Elective right-sided colon resections for stage I to III colon adenocarcinoma were performed at 4 university colorectal centers between June 2008 and December 2014. PATIENTS: Seven hundred sixty-two patients were eligible to receive the questionnaire in November 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the risk of diarrhea (Bristol stool scale score of 6-7), 4 or more bowel movements daily, and the impact of bowel function on quality of life. Secondary outcomes were other bowel symptoms, chronic pain, and quality of life measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one (63.8%) and 324 (59.9%) patients undergoing complete mesocolic excision and conventional resections responded after a median of 3.99 (interquartile range, 2.11-5.32) and 4.11 (interquartile range, 3.01-5.53) years (p = 0.04). Complete mesocolic excision was not associated with increased risk of diarrhea (adjusted OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.57-1.95; p = 0.84), 4 or more bowel movements daily (adjusted OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.57-2.24; p = 0.68), or lower quality of life (adjusted OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.49-1.40; p = 0.50). Complete mesocolic excision was associated nonsignificantly with nocturnal bowel movements, but not associated with chronic pain or other secondary outcomes. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the retrospective design with unknown baseline symptoms. Responding patients were younger but without obvious selection bias. The outcome "diarrhea" seemed somehow sensitive to information bias. CONCLUSION: Right-sided complete mesocolic excision seems associated with neither bowel dysfunction nor impaired quality of life when compared with conventional surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A665.

Lymph node metastases in the gastrocolic ligament in patients with colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival after colorectal cancer may be improved by more extensive resection of the primary tumor and lymph nodes. Resection of the gastroepiploic and infrapyloric lymph nodes in the gastrocolic ligament has been proposed as a standard procedure when resecting tumors located in the proximity of the flexures or in the transverse colon. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to present our findings of metastases in the gastrocolic ligament in a consecutive series of patients. DESIGN: This was a single-center retrospective study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in a colorectal cancer center. PATIENTS: All of the colon adenocarcinoma resections with relevant tumor location from June 1, 2008, to December 31, 2012 were included in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence of lymph node metastases in the gastrocolic ligament in colon adenocarcinomas located in the proximity of the flexures or in the transverse colon was measured. RESULTS: Gastrocolic resection was performed in 130 patients. Thirty-two patients were excluded because of a lack of information about gastrocolic lymph node status in the pathology reports. Median age of the remaining 98 patients was 70 years (range, 30-90 years), and 57% were men. Gastrocolic lymph nodes were found in 86 specimens (88%) with a median number of 4 lymph nodes (range, 0-16 lymph nodes). Thirty-four patients (35%) had mesocolic lymph node metastases. Gastrocolic lymph node metastases were found in 4 (12%) of these 34 patients and in 4% of all 98 included patients. Gastrocolic lymph node metastases were related to perineural invasion (p > 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study include the retrospective design, size of material, and lack of gastrocolic ligament lymph node status in the pathology report in some patients. CONCLUSIONS: Metastases in the gastroepiploic or infrapyloric lymph nodes can be found in patients with tumors located in the proximity of the flexures or in the transverse colon. Further studies are needed to reveal the clinical relevance of this finding, with special focus on recurrence risk and long-term survival.

Less tachycardia during transnasal versus conventional gastroscopy.

INTRODUCTION: Transnasal endoscopy is well tolerated, but physiological benefits compared with conventional gastroscopy have not been studied in detail. The aims of this randomised study were to evaluate cardiopulmonary features, patient tolerance, and the endoscopist's evaluation of transnasal versus conventional endoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to either a conventionally sized transoral (50 patients) or to a transnasal endoscopy (48 patients). Pulse rate and oxygen saturation were registered as well as the patient's tolerance and the endoscopist's evaluation of the procedure. RESULTS: The success rate for transnasal gastroscopy was 77%, mainly because of nasal stenosis. The per- and post-endoscopy pulse rates of the conventional group were elevated compared with those of the transnasal group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02). Procedural discomfort in the two groups was similar, but significantly fewer transnasal patients reported gagging (p < 0.01). The endoscopists evaluated the technical features as good even if they did not reach those of conventional gastroscopy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, transnasal gastroscopy was technically inferior to conventional gastroscopy. There was no benefit in terms of patient comfort, except for less gagging. A lower stress response was indicated by significantly lower pulse rates during transnasal than during conventional gastroscopy, but the clinical relevance of this finding needs to be further investigated.